Writing in Harm Reduction Journal this season, Dr. Rodu proves the F.D.A.’s results “are very unlikely to possess any possible significance to users” since it detected chemicals at “about one-million times lower concentrations than are conceivably associated with human health.” His conclusion is shared by Michael Siegel, a teacher at the Boston University School of Public Health.
Why there's a prejudice against e-cigarettes among anti-smoking groups,” Dr “it boggles my mind. Siegel said. He added that it made no sense to fret about theoretical dangers from small levels of many chemicals in e-cigarettes once the option is famous to be deadly: cigarettes containing hundreds of chemicals, including dozens of carcinogens and thousands of toxins.
Both sides in the argument concur that e-cigarettes should be studied more carefully and subjected to tighter regulation, including quality-control standards and a ban on sales to minors. Nevertheless the harm-reduction part, which includes the American Association of Public Health Physicians and the American Council on Science and Health, sees no reason to stop adults from using e-cigarettes. In Britain, the Royal College of Physicians has denounced “irrational and immoral” regulations inhibiting the introduction of safer nicotine-delivery devices.
“Nicotine itself is not especially hazardous,” the British medical culture concluded in 2007. “If nicotine could be provided in a form that is effective and acceptable as a cigarette substitute, numerous lives could be saved.”
The amount of Americans trying e-cigarettes quadrupled from 2009 to 2010, according to the Centers for Illness Control. Their survey last year discovered that 1.2 percent of adults, or near to three million people, reported using them in the previous month.
“E-cigarettes could replace much or nearly all of cigarette use in the U.S. His group has previously campaigned for smoke-free public places, higher cigarette taxes and graphic warnings on cigarette packs, but he now finds himself at odds with many of his former allies over the question of e-cigarettes.
“There is not any evidence that e-cigarettes have ever hurt anyone, or that youngsters or non-smokers have begun utilizing the products,” Mr. Godshall said.
It would be a challenge to conventional wisdom regarding the movement, if thousands of people switch from smoking to vaping. The decline in smoking is often attributed to paternalistic and prohibitionist social policies, and it’s ritually invoked as a reason for crackdowns on other services and products — trans-fats, sodium, soft-drinks, Quarter-pounders.
But the sharpest drop in smoking rates in the United States occurred in the decades before 1990, when public-health authorities concentrated on simply educating people about the risks. The decline has been slower the past two decades despite increasingly complex smoking-cessation programs and increasingly coercive tactics: punitive taxes; limits on advertising and advertising; smoking bans in practices, restaurants and pretty much every other sort of public space.
Some 50 million Americans continue to smoke, and it’s not because they’re too stupid to realize it’s dangerous. It's been linked by researchers (and smokers) to stress and paid down anxiety, lower-weight, faster response time and improved focus.
“It’s time for you to be honest with all the hundreds of millions, and 50 million Americans around the globe, who use tobacco,” Dr. Rodu creates. “The benefits they get from tobacco have become true, not imaginary or perhaps the periodic removal of withdrawal.
“It’s time for you to abandon the myth that tobacco is devoid of benefits, and to concentrate on how we are able to help smokers continue to derive those benefits using a safer delivery system.”
I agree that abstinence is the most effective policy. Yet it’s certainly not working for many individuals. No one knows just what long-term advantages they’d gain from e-cigarettes, but we can say one thing with confidence: Each time they light-up a tobacco-cigarette, they’d be better off vaping.
Why there's a prejudice against e-cigarettes among anti-smoking groups,” Dr “it boggles my mind. Siegel said. He added that it made no sense to fret about theoretical dangers from small levels of many chemicals in e-cigarettes once the option is famous to be deadly: cigarettes containing hundreds of chemicals, including dozens of carcinogens and thousands of toxins.
Both sides in the argument concur that e-cigarettes should be studied more carefully and subjected to tighter regulation, including quality-control standards and a ban on sales to minors. Nevertheless the harm-reduction part, which includes the American Association of Public Health Physicians and the American Council on Science and Health, sees no reason to stop adults from using e-cigarettes. In Britain, the Royal College of Physicians has denounced “irrational and immoral” regulations inhibiting the introduction of safer nicotine-delivery devices.
“Nicotine itself is not especially hazardous,” the British medical culture concluded in 2007. “If nicotine could be provided in a form that is effective and acceptable as a cigarette substitute, numerous lives could be saved.”
The amount of Americans trying e-cigarettes quadrupled from 2009 to 2010, according to the Centers for Illness Control. Their survey last year discovered that 1.2 percent of adults, or near to three million people, reported using them in the previous month.
“E-cigarettes could replace much or nearly all of cigarette use in the U.S. His group has previously campaigned for smoke-free public places, higher cigarette taxes and graphic warnings on cigarette packs, but he now finds himself at odds with many of his former allies over the question of e-cigarettes.
“There is not any evidence that e-cigarettes have ever hurt anyone, or that youngsters or non-smokers have begun utilizing the products,” Mr. Godshall said.
It would be a challenge to conventional wisdom regarding the movement, if thousands of people switch from smoking to vaping. The decline in smoking is often attributed to paternalistic and prohibitionist social policies, and it’s ritually invoked as a reason for crackdowns on other services and products — trans-fats, sodium, soft-drinks, Quarter-pounders.
But the sharpest drop in smoking rates in the United States occurred in the decades before 1990, when public-health authorities concentrated on simply educating people about the risks. The decline has been slower the past two decades despite increasingly complex smoking-cessation programs and increasingly coercive tactics: punitive taxes; limits on advertising and advertising; smoking bans in practices, restaurants and pretty much every other sort of public space.
Some 50 million Americans continue to smoke, and it’s not because they’re too stupid to realize it’s dangerous. It's been linked by researchers (and smokers) to stress and paid down anxiety, lower-weight, faster response time and improved focus.
“It’s time for you to be honest with all the hundreds of millions, and 50 million Americans around the globe, who use tobacco,” Dr. Rodu creates. “The benefits they get from tobacco have become true, not imaginary or perhaps the periodic removal of withdrawal.
“It’s time for you to abandon the myth that tobacco is devoid of benefits, and to concentrate on how we are able to help smokers continue to derive those benefits using a safer delivery system.”
I agree that abstinence is the most effective policy. Yet it’s certainly not working for many individuals. No one knows just what long-term advantages they’d gain from e-cigarettes, but we can say one thing with confidence: Each time they light-up a tobacco-cigarette, they’d be better off vaping.