This electronic cigarette, or e-cigarette, contains a small tank of liquid nicotine answer that's vaporized to form an aerosol mist.
Polosa’s test had cut their typical cigarette use by at least 50-percent. Very nearly a quarter had stopped entirely. Though it was just a small pilot study, the results fit with other encouraging data and bolster hopes these e-cigarettes may be the most reliable tool yet for reducing the global death toll from smoking.
It’s a coalition of government officials and antismoking groups who have been wanting to ban their sale and warning about the risks of e-cigarettes.
The dispute is part of a long-running philosophical discussion about public health policy, but by having an odd role reversal. Previously, conservatives have leaned toward “abstinence only” policies for dealing with issues like teenage pregnancy and heroin addiction, while liberals have been available to “harm reduction” approaches like encouraging contraception and dispensing methadone.
Though, the abstinence forces tend to be more liberal, including Democratic officers at the state and national-level who've been attempting to end the sale of e-cigarettes and prohibit their used in smoke-free places, when it comes to nicotine. They’ve suggested that smokers who desire an alternative source of nicotine should use only totally examined products and services like Nicorette gum and prescription sections — and use them only briefly, as a means to log off nicotine altogether.
The prohibitionists lost that battle a year ago, once the F.D.A. was over-ruled in court, but they’ve continued the battle by publicizing the supposed dangers of e-cigarettes. They argue that the products, like cigarette, decrease the incentive for people to stop nicotine and may be a “gateway” for young people and non-smokers to become nicotine addicts. And they report an F.D.A. Notice that a few chemicals in the steam of e-cigarettes might be “harmful” and “toxic.” Nevertheless the agency has never offered evidence that the trace amounts actually cause any damage, and it's forgotten to say that similar traces of these chemicals have been found in other F.D.A.-approved items, including nicotine patches and gum. The technique and warnings have already been lambasted in medical journals by Doctor.